This-Lifers and Afterlifers

It's some time since I talked with my namesake Douglas Ezzy so it's good to have this chance to pick up some of his points even though Tasmania may not be the perfect location to boomerang something back to him from Durham UK. Good, too, since my more frequent friendly chats with Allan Kellehear find some echo in that conversation.

By Douglas Davies

I am both an anthropologist and theologian with theoretical and practical interests. After an initial degree in Anthropology at Durham I engaged in my first research on Mormonism at the Oxford Institute of Social Anthropology under the supervision of the sociologist Bryan Wilson. I then read a theology degree at Durham and shortly afterwards became Lecturer at Nottingham University where I became Professor of Religious Studies before leaving for Durham in 1997. During that period I engaged in further work on Mormonism, as well as in Sikhism and Anglicanism, and in death rites. I also completed my first doctorate there on the issue of meaning and salvation. In Durham, as Professor in the Study of Religion, I help teach undergraduate modules on the Introduction to the Study of Religion, and Death, Ritual and Belief, and a module for postgraduates on Ritual, Symbolism and Belief in the Anthropology of Religion. Academically speaking, I also hold the degree of D.Litt. from Oxford as well as an Honorary Dr. Theol. from the University of Uppsala in Sweden. In 2009 I was made an Academician of the Academy of Social Sciences.

Douglas Davies

I am both an anthropologist and theologian with theoretical and practical interests. After an initial degree in Anthropology at Durham I engaged in my first research on Mormonism at the Oxford Institute of Social Anthropology under the supervision of the sociologist Bryan Wilson. I then read a theology degree at Durham and shortly afterwards became Lecturer at Nottingham University where I became Professor of Religious Studies before leaving for Durham in 1997. During that period I engaged in further work on Mormonism, as well as in Sikhism and Anglicanism, and in death rites. I also completed my first doctorate there on the issue of meaning and salvation. In Durham, as Professor in the Study of Religion, I help teach undergraduate modules on the Introduction to the Study of Religion, and Death, Ritual and Belief, and a module for postgraduates on Ritual, Symbolism and Belief in the Anthropology of Religion. Academically speaking, I also hold the degree of D.Litt. from Oxford as well as an Honorary Dr. Theol. from the University of Uppsala in Sweden. In 2009 I was made an Academician of the Academy of Social Sciences.

In response to:

‘Good’ Grief? Rituals of World Repairing

Toys, Rabbits, and Princess Diana - three things that may not seem at all connected. However, when one starts to question the notion of grief, bereavement, and death in the contemporary West, these three are more connected than appears. In this podcast, Breann Fallon interviews Professor Douglas Ezzy of the University of Tasmania on the power of symbols...

A response to “Good Grief? Rituals of World Repairing”

by Douglas Davies

It’s some time since I talked with my namesake Douglas Ezzy so it’s good to have this chance to pick up some of his points even though Tasmania may not be the perfect location to boomerang something back to him from Durham UK. Good, too, since my more frequent friendly chats with Allan Kellehear find some echo in that conversation. My rhetorical question today is whether you are an afterlifer or a this-lifer, or what? These are neat terms for complex issues, but neat terms are a sociological refuge amidst otherwise flummoxing complexity and when word-limits are limiting.

The question of talking or not talking about death today seems to me best approached by what I like to call the link between our ‘life-style and deathstyle’, a phrase that subtitles my recent death book Mors Britannica (British Death). My point is that some people’s lifestyle, as with Ezzy’s ‘heroic success’ type of individual, is so life-focused and so entwined with life-stuff, including constant social media, that death must be ignored. It’s rather like having an ingrowing toenail or a sexually transmitted disease or something like that, no-one talks about it if they haven’t got it. And now that those of us living in safe-societies have death left in odd corners or far away it is almost sensible to ignore death. Our lifestyle freezes out any approach to a death-style.

But not for everyone. Some people actually link these two ‘styles’ quite a bit. And here I pick up on Ezzy’s ecological and important point because, in the UK for example, there has been an enormous growth in what is variously called ecological, green, natural, or woodland burials all since the mid 1990s. We now have just about as many woodland burial sites as crematoria in the UK – though numerically cremation itself still takes the great 70 plus percent of deaths. With Hannah Rumble I have studied this ecological practice and seen how growing numbers of people, often older people, think about giving something back to nature (Natural Burial: Traditional-Secular Spiritualities and Funeral Innovation). Woodland burial, in a biodegradable container and without any embalming or solid headstone for posterity, is its own kind of sacred symbol – something set-apart if not actually forbidden in Durkheim’s sense. And symbols, as things that share in what they represent, are important for lifestyle and for our death-style.

Let me explain. The world is full of ideas – death, coffins, grief, espresso coffee – but they stay ‘just’ as ideas until we get some emotional moment in our life, some experience of them. Then, as an emotion such as grief pervades an idea it becomes a value. And some values actually help form our sense of identity, then they serve as beliefs, and for some people those beliefs even fire a sense of destiny to generate religious beliefs. Death for a martyr, for example, is a destiny factor and fully positive. That’s how symbols work, just as anthropologist Victor Turner described them, symbols carry emotional tones linked to us as experiencing bodies just as they also carry some more explicit meanings about life. Our lifestyles predominate until some personal grief brings emotion to bear and suddenly death and grief are no longer just ideas but values or identity and even destiny giving things. And so life-style and death-style see-saw together.

This is another way of seeing what Ezzy was saying, and I agree with him, regarding performance and belief. We learned this, as did both Durkheim and Freud, from the great Scott, William Robertson Smith (Religion of the Semites, 1889) seeing action preceding reflection, belief-experience preceding theology. And much action is group-linked.

Here I find Ezzy’s point on individualism something of a challenge because I think the electric media-web of exchange, including on-line memorials and platforms for shared grief, paradoxical. If you forgive a tremendous generalization, what we meet here, I think, is an infantile narcissism of wanting to be ‘liked’ and followed’ that is far from being ‘individual’ or individualist. It is longing for fandom in a world that is more one of celebrity success than heroic success. That was what made Princess Diana’s death and funeral notable. It was a real-time expression of the early days of the virtual media world.

And what about that rabbit? Let me shift the story, taking it to Harry Potter and to another book Tom Brown’s Schooldays (a book as old as Durkheim and still in print). Each contradicts individualism to speak of friendship, each has a heroic headmaster, each is struck with death, and each is pervaded by negativities of selfishness conquered by loving goodness. If you will forgive me I will now make a big jump and ask you to read and compare these to ask yourself if there really is any truth in ‘postmodernism’ – I doubt it. I jump because death is the grand narrative of existence, woodland burial is one of its symbols, so are cremated remains when turned into jewellery as keepsakes. By contrast, Cryogenics – the freezing of bodies until some future cure of a terminal illness comes along, that is – if you like – a kind of individualist-postmodern symbol grounded in the hope of scientific futures: it is a real ‘liquid’ – identity, hydrogen at that.

But, let’s sing of the frozen body, as of the body-electric, for when Ezzy speaks of Hillsong churches without death-songs it not only reflects what I said above about life-style and deathstyle, but reminded me of the 1970s and 80s when the Charismatic Movement hosted millions of young people, they lacked death-songs too at that time. But even Charismatics die.

You must forgive me for these – perhaps – unpopular swipes at ‘the individual’ and at postmodernity, itself one of the intellectual confidence tricks of a closed circle of academics, and let me pinpoint something about grief that I have recently highlighted in the third edition (2017)of my Death, Ritual and Belief book. There, in a chapter on loss and bereavement I ask us not to think of grief from the starting point of THE individual and taking grief theories in a direction of attachment and loss or even of continuing bonds with the dead, but from the starting point of what a few anthropologists have spoken about for some time as the DIVIDUAL, or dividual personhood. This strange word captures the idea of composite personhood, of my being made up of many experiences of many other people. I cannot detach from my compound-personhood; I do, inevitably, have ongoing bondings with my knowledge and experience of others, though they be dead. At the end of the theoretical day lifestyle and death-style are embedded in personhood, and in the emotions that have flooded ‘ideas’ of death, turning them into values, into identity, and even into destiny.

One great theoretical issue of the study of religion today is that many people stop at the identity-point, secularization dissolves the destiny factor. And this is why ‘life-centred’ funerals increasingly replace funerals aimed at a future existence. And this is why many modern people will not understand either traditional Christian or Muslim afterlifers.

Other EPISODES YOU MIGHT ENJOY

Indian Rationalism, and a Relational Approach to Nonreligion

Podcast

It is unfortunate fact that in popular ‘Western’ imagination, the land of India is frequently orientalised, and naively conceptualized as ‘the quintessential land of religion, spirituality, and miracles.’ Although we would certainly not want to completely invert this stereotype by substituting one unnuanced and inaccurate construct for another, ...
Social Constructionism

Podcast

What is social constructionism, and how is it important to the study of religion? Titus Hjelm explains how approaches which see social realities as built from discourses challenge how we think about ontology, epistemology and power.What is social constructionism, and how is it important to the study of religion? In this interview,
Belief, Belonging, and Academic Careers

Podcast

Almost twenty years ago, Grace Davie observed that despite plenty of studies into the ‘exotic edges’ of religion, ‘the picture in the middle remains remarkably blurred’. Seeking to address this imbalance and engage with the ‘beliefs of ordinary British people in everyday life’, Abby Day's recent book, ...
THATCamp Roundtable on Digital Religious Studies

Podcast

What does it mean to teach or research religious studies digitally? Does religious "data" make digital religious studies distinct within the digital humanities? What is a digital religious studies research project you think more people should know about? How can departments and the field better support digital methods and pedagogies? Six scholars gathered at the AAR's groundbreaking THATCamp to discuss these questions and more!
BASR 2019: The State of the Discipline

Podcast

Vivian Asimos and Theodora Wildcroft took the opportunity to ask the delegates of BASR 2019 what inspired them about the conference theme, their opinion about major trends in the discipline, and how they were personally feeling about REF 2021.
Geographies of Religion and the Secular in Ireland

Podcast

In this broad-ranging interview, O’Mahony eruditely demonstrates what geography can bring to the academic study of ‘religion’ and presents Ireland as a fascinating context within which to examine processes of boundary-making between the contested constructs of ‘religion’ and the ‘secular’.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

The views expressed in podcasts, features and responses are the views of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Religious Studies Project or our sponsors. The Religious Studies Project is produced by the Religious Studies Project Association (SCIO), a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation (charity number SC047750).