Painfully Stripped Away, Painfully Added

Adam Park's response to episode 330 highlights boxing as a site for identity creation and the legacy of muscular Christianity as two important takeaways of our interview with Arlene Sanchez-Walsh.

By Adam Park

Adam Park is Research Fellow for Lived Religion in the Digital Age and contingent faculty in the Department of American Studies at Saint Louis University. His current book manuscript, Savage Saints: Muscular Christianity, Human Nature, and Fighting in America, 1858 – 2020, details the religious formation of aggression through boxing, professional wrestling, eastern martial arts, and contemporary mixed martial arts. He can be found here: adam.park@slu.edu.

Adam Park

Adam Park is Research Fellow for Lived Religion in the Digital Age and contingent faculty in the Department of American Studies at Saint Louis University. His current book manuscript, Savage Saints: Muscular Christianity, Human Nature, and Fighting in America, 1858 – 2020, details the religious formation of aggression through boxing, professional wrestling, eastern martial arts, and contemporary mixed martial arts. He can be found here: adam.park@slu.edu.

In response to:

Boxing and Religious Identity

Are boxers' religious affiliations only as skin deep as their tattoos? Find out in this conversation about boxing and religious identity with Prof. Arlene Sanchez Walsh by David McConeghy.

Painfully Stripped Away, Painfully Added: A Response to Episode 330 “Boxing and Religious Identity” with Arlene Sanchez-Walsh

by Adam Park

Above, Andy Ruiz, Jr., ex-heavyweight champion (2019), stand outside of the ring, raising one golden glove.

It’s true. There’s something interesting going on with boxing. And there are several things that make it so, as we learn from this discussion with Arlene Sanchez-Walsh. Here’s a few points of conversation extending from her insight.

On the question of identity. Perhaps more than other activities, other sports, boxing makes you. Subsuming, consuming, encompassing, in the words of Dr. Sanchez-Walsh, “boxing becomes a person’s identity.” But boxers are always boxers plus – plus one’s religion, ethnicity, nationality, class, and/or gender, etc. The existing literature on boxing very much speaks to this. Flags, tattoos, promotional footage, social media – we see it. A “culture of bruising” boxing most surely is; and as Sanchez-Walsh points out, a culture of self-branding boxing has most surely become. As we explore these Goffman-inspired questions around self-presentation and social identity, however, I wonder what other kinds of queries we might [to use a boxing metaphor] pivot around.

Above, Unforgivable Blackness: The Rise and Fall of Jack Johnson, directed by Ken Burns(Florentine Films, 2005).

To foreground the process of subject formation – of the creation of a boxerly habitus – as Loic Wacquant has, is to reveal something different, less socially signified and more experientially registered. We might ask how boxer-ness is publicly performed. We might also ask how boxer-ness is affectively felt. After all, with all the hitting and all the blood, there’s something very carnal about the craft. Of course, Foucault and Bourdieu are our friends here. But Elaine Scarry is tailor-made. Pain is key. Taking it. Giving it. Fists and faces. “For what is quite literally at stake in the body in pain is the making and unmaking of the world,” Scarry writes. To wit, what is painfully stripped away to make a boxer? And what is painfully added in its place?

George Bellows, Dempsey and Firpo (1924)

On the question of boxing’s distinctiveness. Two things make it so, according to Sanchez-Walsh. The first: You may have noticed, boxing is not like other sports. Its execution blurs fact and fun. In the words of Pulitzer Prize winning author Joyce Carol Oates, “One plays football, one doesn’t play boxing.” Bludgeoning another with closed fists might not be ludic. “You could die,” Sanchez-Walsh reminds us, “that’s not typical in sports.” I would add that therein lies its lure. Aware of the cultural charm, the mystic reverie that overcomes, many have taken note. “The grip it laid on men’s souls,” wrote Jack London, was undeniable and universal. There is a prepared audience and a ready range of fighters, attuned to their own sublimation, seeking liberation from societal etiquette. Bloodlusty. Marshalling presumptions of ancient memories. Returning to the repressed. Under the whitewashed nomenclature of “sweet science,” boxing’s singularity is in its ability to evoke sensations of reality, of bare life, of a nature nasty, brutish, and short.

Above, a video of WWI Physical & Bayonet Training (1918).

The second: The quality that really sets boxing apart is its individualism, according to Sanchez-Walsh. That is, boxing is a thing done alone. This may be, or at least might seem so at the level of the match. But here are some other characters whose involvement we could consider. Spouses, partners, parents, and children – and their lent logistical and emotional support. The many dozens of sparring partners, the athletic trainers, the multiple coaches, the “fight camp” – and their role in aiding physical improvement. The audience and fight fans – and their freely given effervescent encouragement, an empowering wellspring of good cheer for many a fighter. The boxing announcer Bruce Buffer – and his energizing and triumphant introductions. The countless pugs that have come before – evolving embodied lesson, accumulatively creating corporeal curriculum. One could go on. The point is that boxing – giving and taking pain, providing and consuming inspiration, teaching and learning – is a highly networked activity that extends well beyond the minutes in the ring.

Above, Betty Grable in Footlight Serenade (1942)

On the question of boxing’s salvific qualities. Addressing the way that boxers rhetorically situate themselves to their fistic craft, Sanchez-Walsh perceptively notes, “all of these stories kind of mesh.” Though she “never talks about religion,” for instance, Mia St. John relates hers as a tale from bad to boxing. Ex-pug Johnny Tapia does too. There is a very clear pattern. In a widely recognized way, boxing converts, saves, with or without mention to specific religious traditions. From lost to found, terrible to terrific. The intellectual genealogy that Sanchez-Walsh provides for these kinds of accounts points towards recent makings– baby-boomer Sheilaism, popular psychology, and self-help traditions. But the cultural sources of these sentiments are begging for further historiographic probings. My recent article on the religious and governmental campaign to teach boxing to soldiers during WWI – to win the war and to save soldiers from their effete upbringings – is a small drop in this bucket.

Above, the muscular Christian themes are strong in this James River Church (Ozark, MO) 2013 Men’s Conference Recap.

My sense of boxing (and sports in general) is that both participants and fans relate to such activities in unique ways. That much is evident. Presuming boxing special, even salvific, the activity is clearly and commonly felt as such. And so, the question is therefore singular. From whence comes this special feeling of personal transformation brought upon by participation in sport, from a life listless to a life worth living? My sense is that somewhere within the annals of muscular Christian history lies the answer. It began with 19th-century attempts to link a bourgeoning physical culture with moral endeavors. It began by active Christian campaigns to wrest control of certain sporty practices from the evil influences of gamblers, pick-pockets, and prostitutes. It began by appropriating a range of physical activities and entertainments and re-tooling them as an orchestrated means of social improvement (rather than social damnation). – Twentieth century sport culture did not forsake its heritage, its strivings for moral cleanliness, its quest for “good sportsmanship.” The social reform logic stuck and even rendered the “religion” invisible. Muscular Christianity got in the bones. With or without Jesus, sport saves.

Above, Steven Sawyer’s Undefeated Note the reference to Psalm 136:12 in the lower right corner.

Other EPISODES YOU MIGHT ENJOY

An Introduction to the Sociology of Religion

Podcast

What is the sociology of religion? What are its particular concerns, dominant themes and defining methodologies? Where did it begin, and how has it evolved? This interview with Grace Davie, the first in our BSA SOCREL series, introduces this important and historically influential approach to the study of religion.
What does religious literacy mean in your context?

Podcast

Will #religiousliteracy save Religious Studies? At the 2019 AAR in San Diego, Dave McConeghy moderated a roundtable with early career scholars about the meaning of religious literacy in their context. Join us for a lively discussion about what it means to teach religious studies with Richard Newton, Chris Jones, Rebekka King, Jenna-Gray-Hildenbrand, Kevin Minister, and Bradly Onishi.
Roundtable: Should Religious Studies be Multidisciplinary?

Podcast

Ninian Smart was a proponent of the idea that Religious Studies should be "poly-methodical"; but should Religious Studies as a discipline incorporate theories and methodologies from multiple other disciplines, such as sociology, anthropology or history? When RS departments have run on an interdisciplinary basis, have they been successful?
Sufism

Podcast

In this interview, Milad Milani discusses the basic orientation and history of Sufi thought. He also speaks about the diverse national variations of Sufism, particularly with respect to Iranian (or “Persianate”) Sufism. The interview concludes with a few critical remarks on the questionable appropriation of Sufism in contemporary Western discourses on religion.
Teaching and Learning in Contemporary Religious Studies

Podcast

Today we are joined by Dr Dominic Corrywright of Oxford Brookes University in the UK, to discuss current developments in higher education pedagogy, the challenges and opportunities that these present for Religious Studies, and some practical examples from Dominic’s own experience.
Negotiating Gender in Contemporary Occultism

Podcast

In this interview conducted at the 2018 EASR conference in Bern, Sammy Bishop speaks to Manon Hedenborg White about the development of Western esotericism, charting the influence of the infamous Aleister Crowley and his philosophy of Thelema. They explore Crowley's somewhat ambiguous view of gender, before bringing the research into the present day, on how gender roles in contemporary Thelema can be contested and negotiated. Finally, Hedenborg White delves into the important but often overlooked role of women in the development of contemporary Occultism.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

The views expressed in podcasts, features and responses are the views of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Religious Studies Project or our sponsors. The Religious Studies Project is produced by the Religious Studies Project Association (SCIO), a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation (charity number SC047750).