“Communicating Religion”. Annual Conference of the EASR

Visiting your Alma Mater is always accompanied by mixed emotions. On the one hand you see familiar things you missed but on the other hand you’re confronted with downsides you hoped were a thing of the past. My visit to the KULeuven for the EASR conference had both, although the positives far outweighed the downsides.

By Hans Van Eyghen

Hans Van Eyghen is a PHD-candidate at the department of philosophy at the Free University of Amsterdam. He is part of the Abraham Kuyper Center for Science and the Big Questions and his research is on the philosophical implications of the cognitive science of religion and more precisely on how cognitive scientists try to explain religious belief on a naturalistic basis.

Hans Van Eyghen

Hans Van Eyghen is a PHD-candidate at the department of philosophy at the Free University of Amsterdam. He is part of the Abraham Kuyper Center for Science and the Big Questions and his research is on the philosophical implications of the cognitive science of religion and more precisely on how cognitive scientists try to explain religious belief on a naturalistic basis.

In response to:

A conference report by Hans Van Eyghen

Visiting your Alma Mater is always accompanied by mixed emotions. On the one hand you see familiar things you missed but on the other hand you’re confronted with downsides you hoped were a thing of the past. My visit to the KULeuven for the EASR conference had both, although the positives far outweighed the downsides.

One downside all former KUL students are familiar with is the constant renovation works. The conference venue was only partly finished and the coffee breaks were frequently interrupted by noise. Luckily this was soon forgotten when one of the major strong points of the KUL manifested; its ability to attract a lot of renowned international speakers. The first keynote speaker was Guy Stroumsa who talked about religious evolution in late antiquity. His talk covered developments in pagan Roman religion, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, Judaism and Manicheism during that era.

The keynote was followed by the first parallel session. Each slot offered a choice of no less than 12 sessions. I mostly chose sessions on minority religions or esoteric traditions. During the first session titled ‘New Religious Movements’, Suzanne Owen discussed a well-known problem in modern paganism, the difficulty in lumping rather diffuse groups together. She discussed it from a legal perspective and noted that some pagan groups had difficulty in gaining official recognition in the United Kingdom. Vladlena Fedianina’s talk was on a remarkable Japanese movement called Kofuku-no Kagaka. The movement is also known as ‘happy science’. Its leader claims to be able to channel messages from all sorts of (living) people. Fedianina focused on the movement’s efforts in Russia, for example by means of publishing channeled messages from Russian president Vladimir Putin. The third speaker, Matous Vencalek talked about his field work among Czech pagan groups.

The first session I attended on the second day unfortunately had only one speaker. Isabel Canzobre Martinez discussed indications of people identifying with various gods in the Greek magical papyri. She compared the practice with Jesus identifying with the God of Israel in the New Testament. The keynote of the day, Jan Bremmer took the theme of the conference to heart and talked about religious education and communication in antiquity. He argued that education into antique pagan religion mainly happened by having children seeing and partaking in rituals. It was a bit unfortunate that Bremmer didn’t take recent cognitive research about ritual competence[1] and the role of rituals in community-building[2] into account.

Cognitive science was not missing from the third day. Early in the morning three speakers had a panel titled ‘Esotericism and the Cognitive Science of Religion. Egil Asprem started off and discussed how recent theories of predictive coding could shed more light on kataphatic practices. Predictive coding models suggest that the human mind is constantly making hypotheses about the outside world and updating them when needed. Asprem discussed how these models could shed light on kataphatic practices where people try to gain contact or knowledge about higher realms or divine beings. Gusmundur Markusson applied cognitive semiotics to how Alastair Crowley’s ‘Book of the Law’ is used in some forms of western esotericism. He argued that the opaqueness of the book allows readers to find divergent meanings in it. This (among other things) makes the book intriguing. To end the panel, Jesper Sorensen made some general comments how cognitive science of religion can aid the study of esotericism and how the study of esotericism can also help to move cognitive science of religion forward. In the second session I attended two Russian scholars talked about older Russian anthropologists who studies Siberian shamanism. The third speaker did not focus on Russia but argued against Egyptologists who claimed that ancient Egyptian religion did not know shamanic practices (they did).

The afternoon started with a keynote lecture by Ann Taves. She argued for replacing the world religion paradigm with a worldview paradigm. Researching worldviews rather than the five world religions would be more inclusive and could help tackle current problems like partisanship and populism in her view. However, when discussing the course she teaches at the university of California at Santa Barbara, Taves had to admit she still used the world religions paradigm. She was criticized for this during the Q&A. I spend the rest of the afternoon in sessions on Shinto. Michael Pye introduced the first session with a talk on diversity within Shinto. Dunja Jelesijevic discussed interactions between Shinto and Japanese Noh theatre. Tomoko Iwasawa touched on the topic that would be the main point of discussion in the second session on Shinto; namely whether it is possible to use the term ‘Shinto’ for medieval and ancient Japanese religion or whether these are very different things. During the second session, Yeonjoo Park talked about influences of Tendai Buddhism in medieval Shinto. The last speaker, Mart Teeuwen, voiced his doubt that Shinto can be traced back to medieval times, let alone to ancient times.

The fourth day, I attended a session on modern shamanism. Tiina Mahlmäki drew an interesting parallel between shamanistic practices and ethnography. Shamans attribute an important role to the imagination and try to develop ‘inner senses’ to tap into other forms of knowledge. Mahlmäki claimed that ethnographers often have to rely on imagination to capture what their subjects are doing as well. In her view some methods used by researchers are also similar to shamanistic practices. Her example was the ‘creative writing’ many ethnographers do when taking notes. Jaana Kouri (who is a shamanistic practitioner herself) discussed how shamans are able to shift consciousness. She argued that shamanistic knowledge is best construed as a joint production of both human and non-human actors. She also claimed that many western shamanistic practitioners have an academic background. I did not attend more sessions on the fourth day apart from the keynote lecture. In it, Jenny Berglund compared various forms of (Islamic) religious education in Europe.

The EASR conference showed how diverse and interesting religious studies is. A downside is that it also showed how the diversity does not always lead to interaction. Few presenters showed an active interest in what scholars who study other religions or approaches do. The keynote lectures were also largely confined to a subclass of religious studies. I could not help but thinking that scholars could make a greater effort to learn from each other. For example, the speakers on modern shamanism could arguably learn from the speakers on Siberian shamanism. Large conferences, like the EASR conference, are probably not the best venue to serve as a bridge between scholars.

 

[1] See Lawson, E. T. and R. N. McCauley (1990). Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

[2] See Whitehouse, H. and J. A. Lanman (2014). “The Ties That Bind Us.” Current Anthropology 55(6): 674-695.

 

 Fund the RSP while you shop! Use an Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca, or Amazon.com affiliate link whenever you make a purchase. There’s no additional cost to you, but every bit helps us stay on the air! 

We need your support!

Want to support us directly? Become a monthly Patron or consider giving us a one-time donation through PayPal

Other EPISODES YOU MIGHT ENJOY

Media and the Study of Religion

Podcast

Vivian Asimos, Chris Cotter, Time Hutchings and Suzanne Owen discuss the intersections of Media and the Study of Religion.
Historical, Popular, and Scholarly Constructions of Yoga

Podcast

In its earliest uses, the word “yoga” meant “yoke,” primarily yoking a warhorse to a chariot. In the classical period, yoga took on a variety of other meanings, including yoking the mind-body complex through meditative practices, such as breath control and mantras, to achieve liberation. In this interview, ...
Alex Norman on Spiritual Tourism

Podcast

What would you think if I told you I had just come back from a holiday in Aya Napa? How about Santiago de Compostella or Glastonbury? How about Mecca? When does travel become pilgrimage, and what are the spiritual factors behind our holiday choices? In this week’s interview, Alex Norman and David Robertson discuss the history and modern relevance of journeys undertaken for spiritual benefit and transformation.
Descriptions of Religion as Explanations of Religion

Podcast

This week's podcast features Kathryn Lofton and John Modern on the entanglement of description and explanation, the importance of self-reflexivity, and answering the "so what?" question In this week's podcast, Kathryn Lofton and John Modern join Adam Miller for a conversation that hovers around the relationship...
RE Commission report: A Way Forward?

Podcast

At a recent RE research and policy conference #2020RE, Dr Wendy Dossett had the opportunity to chat with two of the Commissioners and authors of the Religion and Worldviews report, Dr Joyce Miller and Prof Eleanor Nesbitt, along with Religious Education sociologist (and convener of SOCREL), Céline Benoit. Their conversation ranged over some of the following issues: the rationale for the move from calling the subject ‘Religious Education’ to ‘Religion and Worldviews’; the inadequacy for the classroom of a world religions approach; the degree to which faith communities are entitled to influence what gets taught in schools; and the anomaly of the so-called withdrawal clause.
Mormonism, Growth and Decline

Podcast

Can Mormonism be described as a New Religious Movement? Is there a unified phenomenon which can be classified as Mormonism? Is Mormonism to be considered as a form of Christianity? This week, Chris is joined by Ryan Cragun – Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Tampa, Florida – to discuss not only these conceptual issues,...

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

The views expressed in podcasts, features and responses are the views of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Religious Studies Project or our sponsors. The Religious Studies Project is produced by the Religious Studies Project Association (SCIO), a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation (charity number SC047750).